Home Hearings Calendar Journal House News
 
House Members>
Bill Information>
Committees>
Media Center>
General Information>
Past Session Archives
Directory of Representatives
House Leadership
Legislator Lookup
General Info
Bill List
Bill Tracking
Bill Activity Reports
Floor Activity>
Copyright Information
Dates of Interest
Subject Index
House Calendar
House Floor Schedule
Current House Actions
Past House Actions
Announced Legislation
Committee Assignments
House Committees
Committee Descriptions
Hearing Schedules>
Hearing Room Schedule
2013 Interim Committees
Bipartisan Investigative Committee on Privacy Protection
House Hearing Schedule
Senate Hearing Schedule
Latest News
This Week in the Missouri House
Audio
Video
Photos
Media Staff
Live Debates>
House Debate
Senate Debate
Problems with Audio
Chief Clerk of the House
Journal of the House
Dates of Interest
Rules of the House (PDF)
Missouri Constitution
Missouri Statutes
The Legislative Process>
House Information>
Showing You, a student handbook  (PDF)
Making The Law
How a Bill Becomes Law (PDF)
Glossary of Terms
House Staff Directory
Employment Opportunities
Intern Activities
Current Bid Items
Third Floor Rotunda Schedule
Capitol Floor Maps
Visiting The House
Related Links Missouri State Government Missouri Senate Revised Statutes of Missouri Search Revised Statutes of Missouri (RSMO) Missouri Constitution Visiting the House House Job Opportunities Frequently Requested Resources
Who is your Representative?

(zip code or zip+4)
 
Printer Friendly
SJR29C-SAME-SEX MARRIAGES
Summary of the House Committee Version of the Bill

SJR 29 -- SAME-SEX MARRIAGES

SPONSOR:  Steelman (Engler)

COMMITTEE ACTION:  Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Children
and Families by a vote of 7 to 6.

This proposed constitutional amendment specifies that only
marriages between a man and a woman will be valid and recognized
in the State of Missouri.

FISCAL NOTE:  Estimated Cost on General Revenue Fund of $36,840
in FY 2005, $0 in FY 2006, and $0 in FY 2007.  No impact on Other
State Funds in FY 2005, FY 2006, and FY 2007.

PROPONENTS:  Supporters say that the resolution gives Missouri
citizens the opportunity to express their opinions and values on
how marriage should be defined in Missouri.  It encourages
responsibility and faithful relationships.  Redefining marriage
to include other types of relationships erodes the institution of
marriage.  It is prudent to amend the Missouri Constitution
because of what has happened in other states.

Testifying for the bill were Senator Steelman; Missouri Catholic
Conference; Missouri Family Network; Missouri Baptist Convention;
and Concerned Women of America.

OPPONENTS:  Those who oppose the bill say that the amendment will
limit the rights of Missourians.  The issue is about equal
application of the law to all citizens of the state.

Testifying against the bill were Michael Getty; and PROMO.

Amy Woods, Legislative Analyst

Copyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives

redbar
Missouri House of Representatives
92nd General Assembly, 2nd Regular Session
Last Updated September 23, 2004 at 11:17 am