HB1169P
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
[PERFECTED]
HOUSE SUBSTITUTE FOR
HOUSE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR
HOUSE BILLS NOS. 1169 & 1271
88TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Taken up for Perfection March 20, 1996. House Substitute for House
Committee Substitute for House Bills Nos. 1169 & 1271 ordered
Perfected and printed, as amended.
DOUGLAS W. BURNETT, Chief Clerk
L2855.10P
AN ACT
To repeal sections 43.506, 82.1000, 302.060, 302.309, 302.500,
302.505, 302.510, 302.520, 302.530, 302.535, 302.541, 311.310,
311.325, 312.407, 479.500, 577.012, 577.020, 577.021, 577.023,
577.037, and 577.039, RSMo 1994, and sections 302.010, 302.171,
302.302, 302.312 and 577.614, RSMo Supp. 1995, relating to operation
of motor vehicles, and to enact in lieu thereof twenty-six new
sections relating to the same subject, with penalty provisions.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri,
as follows:
Section A. Sections 43.506, 82.1000, 302.060, 302.309, 302.500,
302.505, 302.510, 302.520, 302.530, 320.535, 302.541, 311.310,
311.325, 312.407, 479.500, 577.012, 577.020, 577.021, 577.023,
577.037, and 577.039, RSMo 1994, and sections 302.010, 302.171,
302.302, 302.312 and 577.614, RSMo Supp. 1995, are repealed and
twenty-six new sections enacted in lieu thereof, to be known as
sections 43.506, 82.1000, 302.010, 302.060, 302.171, 302.302,
302.309, 302.312, 302.500, 302.505, 302.510, 302.520, 302.530,
302.535, 302.541, 311.310, 311.325, 312.407, 479.500, 577.012,
577.020, 577.021, 577.023, 577.037, 577.039 and 577.614, to read
as follows:
43.506. 1. Those offenses considered reportable for the purposes
of sections 43.500 to 43.530 include all felonies and serious
or aggravated misdemeanors consistent with the reporting standards
established by the National Crime Information Center, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, for the Federal Interstate Identification
Index System. In addition, all cases arising [under]
pursuant to sections 566.010 to 566.141, RSMo, where the
defendant pleads guilty to an offense involving a child under
seventeen years of age and the court imposes a suspended imposition
of sentence shall be reported. The following types of offenses
[will] shall not be considered reportable
for the purposes of sections 57.403, RSMo, 43.500 to 43.530, and
595.200 to 595.218, RSMo: disturbing the peace, curfew violation,
loitering, false fire alarm, disorderly conduct, nonspecific charges
of suspicion or investigation, and general traffic violations
and all misdemeanor violations of the state wildlife code. [Second
and subsequent offense traffic] All violations for
driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol are reportable.
All offenses considered reportable shall be reviewed annually
and noted in the Missouri charge code manual established in section
43.512. All information collected [under] pursuant
to sections 43.500 to 43.530 shall be available only as set
forth in section 610.120, RSMo.
2. With the exception of the manual reporting of arrests and fingerprints
by law enforcement agencies as noted in subsection 2 of section
43.503, and notwithstanding subsections 2 to 7 of section 43.503,
law enforcement agencies, court clerks, prosecutors and custody
agencies may report required information by electronic medium
either directly to the central repository or indirectly to the
central repository via other criminal justice agency computer
systems in the state with the approval of the advisory committee.
3. In addition to the repository of fingerprint records for individual
offenders, the central repository of criminal history records
for the state shall maintain a repository of latent prints.
82.1000. 1. In addition to forfeiture proceedings pursuant to
sections 513.600 to 513.645, RSMo, the governing body of any constitutional
charter city having a population of more than one hundred thousand
inhabitants and located within a county of the first classification
that adjoins no other county of the first classification may enact
ordinances which would subject to forfeiture any motor vehicle
operated by a person with one or more prior convictions for an
intoxicationrelated traffic offense, as defined in section 577.023,
RSMo, who is prohibited from obtaining a license to operate
a motor vehicle by the director of revenue pursuant to subdivision
(9) or (10) of section 302.060, RSMo, or who has [his]
the person's license to operate a motor vehicle suspended
or revoked, as a result of a finding or a plea of guilty to:
(1) Any intoxicationrelated traffic offense as defined in section
577.023, RSMo; or
(2) Involuntary manslaughter as a result of operating a motor
vehicle while in an intoxicated condition as defined in section
565.024, RSMo.
Such forfeiture pursuant to this subsection shall only be allowed
if such person operates a motor vehicle while [his]
the person's license to operate a motor vehicle is under
such a suspension or revocation.
2. The ordinance allowing forfeitures pursuant to this section
may also provide for the impoundment and forfeiture of a motor
vehicle operated by any person who is classified as a prior offender
or persistent offender pursuant to section 577.023, RSMo, after
the effective date of such ordinance, except that a judgment of
forfeiture may only be rendered if there is a conviction of an
intoxicationrelated traffic offense which causes the owner of
the motor vehicle to be classified as a prior or persistent offender.
3. The ordinance allowing the forfeitures pursuant to this section
may also provide for the impoundment and forfeiture of a motor
vehicle operated by any person who has previously been [adjudicated
in a prior criminal proceeding to be either a persistent offender
or a prior offender] convicted of two or more intoxication-related
traffic offenses, as defined in section 577.023, RSMo, and
who thereafter, pursuant to a chemical test conducted in accordance
with sections 577.020 to 577.041, RSMo, is determined upon probable
cause to have been driving a motor vehicle with a bloodalcohol
concentration equal to or greater than the bloodalcohol percentage
concentration specified in subsection 1 of section 302.520, RSMo,
or any such person who, pursuant to section 577.041, RSMo, has
been requested to submit to a chemical test as described [under]
pursuant to that section, and refused to submit to such
test. [No ordinance allowing forfeiture shall apply to
any person who has received an otherwise lawful license or permit
to operate a motor vehicle.]
4. All forfeiture proceedings pursuant to this section shall be
conducted in accordance with sections 513.600 to 513.645, RSMo,
except the forfeiture proceeding shall be brought by the city
attorney for the city which enacted such ordinances.
5. The ordinance shall also provide that any person claiming an
ownership interest in the motor vehicle subject to forfeiture
shall have all the defenses to the forfeiture proceeding available
to them which they may be entitled to raise [under]
pursuant to sections 513.600 to 513.645, RSMo. The ordinance
shall further provide that, in the event the title documents registered
with the department of revenue for the motor vehicle subject to
forfeiture, at the time of the action giving rise to the forfeiture
proceeding, list persons as owners or coowners of the vehicle
in addition to or other than the operator, and the nonoperator
owner of the motor vehicle has not previously been the operator
or the owner of, a motor vehicle which has been the subject
of a forfeiture proceeding authorized by this section, the motor
vehicle shall be returned to the nonoperator registered owner
and all costs associated with the seizure, towing, storage and
impoundment of the vehicle, and the payment of all court
costs and reasonable attorney fees associated with the forfeiture
proceeding shall be paid by the owners or the operator
of [said] the vehicle. To be entitled to
return of the vehicle all owners shall execute a written agreement
with the municipality stipulating and consenting to the seizure
and forfeiture of the motor vehicle in the event such motor vehicle
is subsequently operated by the same operator [while in
an intoxicated condition] under circumstances which
would allow the municipality to seek forfeiture of such vehicle
[under the] pursuant to an ordinance [enacted
pursuant to] authorized by this section.
302.010. Except where otherwise provided, when used in this chapter,
the following words and phrases mean:
(1) "Circuit court", each circuit court in the state;
(2) "Commercial motor vehicle", a motor vehicle designed
or regularly used for carrying freight and merchandise, or more
than fifteen passengers;
(3) "Conviction", any final conviction; also a forfeiture
of bail or collateral deposited to secure a defendant's appearance
in court, which forfeiture has not been vacated, shall be equivalent
to a conviction, except that when any conviction as a result of
which points are assessed [under] pursuant to
section 302.302 is appealed, the term "conviction" means
the original judgment of conviction for the purpose of determining
the assessment of points, and the date of final judgment affirming
the conviction shall be the date determining the beginning of
any license suspension or revocation [under] pursuant
to section 302.304;
(4) "Director", the director of revenue acting directly
or through [his] the director's authorized
officers and agents;
(5) "Farm tractor", every motor vehicle designed and
used primarily as a farm implement for drawing plows, mowing machines
and other implements of husbandry;
(6) "Highway", any public thoroughfare for vehicles,
including state roads, county roads and public streets, avenues,
boulevards, parkways, or alleys in any municipality;
(7) "Incompetent to drive a motor vehicle", a person
who has become physically incapable of meeting the prescribed
requirements of an examination for an operator's license, or who
has been adjudged by a probate division of the circuit court in
a capacity hearing of being incapacitated;
(8) "License", a license issued by a state to a person
which authorizes a person to operate a motor vehicle;
(9) "Motor vehicle", any selfpropelled vehicle not operated
exclusively upon tracks except motorized bicycles, as defined
in section 307.180, RSMo;
(10) "Motorcycle", a motor vehicle operated on two wheels;
however, this definition shall not include motorized bicycles
as defined in section 301.010, RSMo;
(11) "Motortricycle", a motor vehicle operated on three
wheels, including a motorcycle operated with any conveyance, temporary
or otherwise, requiring the use of a third wheel;
(12) "Moving violation", that character of traffic violation
where at the time of violation the motor vehicle involved is in
motion, except that the term does not include the driving of a
motor vehicle without a valid motor vehicle registration license,
or violations of sections 304.170 to 304.240, RSMo, inclusive,
relating to sizes and weights of vehicles;
(13) "Municipal court", every division of the circuit
court having original jurisdiction to try persons for violations
of city ordinances;
(14) "Nonresident", every person who is not a resident
of this state;
(15) "Operator", every person who is in actual physical
control of a motor vehicle upon a highway;
(16) "Owner", a person who holds the legal title of
a vehicle or in the event a vehicle is the subject of an agreement
for the conditional sale or lease thereof with the right of purchase
upon performance of the conditions stated in the agreement and
with an immediate right of possession vested in the conditional
vendee or lessee, or in the event a mortgagor of a vehicle is
entitled to possession, then such conditional vendee or lessee
or mortgagor shall be deemed the owner for the purpose of sections
302.010 to 302.540;
(17) "Record" includes, but is not limited to, papers,
documents, facsimile information, microphotographic process, electronically
generated or electronically recorded information, digitized images,
deposited or filed with the department of revenue;
(18) "School bus", when used in sections 302.010 to
302.540, means any motor vehicle, either publicly or privately
owned, used to transport students to and from school, or to transport
pupils properly chaperoned to and from any place within the state
for educational purposes. The term "school bus" shall
not include a bus operated by a public utility, municipal corporation
or common carrier authorized to conduct local or interstate transportation
of passengers when such bus is not traveling a specific school
bus route but is:
(a) On a regularly scheduled route for the transportation of farepaying
passengers; or
(b) Furnishing charter service for the transportation of persons
enrolled as students on field trips or other special trips or
in connection with other special events;
(19) "School bus operator", an operator who operates
a school bus as defined in subdivision (18) of this section in
the transportation of any school children and who receives compensation
for such service. The term "school bus operator" shall
not include any person who transports school children as an incident
to [his] employment with a school or school district,
such as a teacher, coach, administrator, secretary, school nurse,
or janitor unless such person is under contract with or employed
by a school or school district as a school bus operator;
(20) "Signature", any method determined by the director
of revenue for the signing, subscribing or verifying of a record,
report, application, driver's license, or other related document
that shall have the same validity and consequences as the actual
signing by the person providing the record, report, application,
driver's license or related document;
(21) "Vehicle", any mechanical device on wheels, designed
primarily for use, or used on highways, except motorized bicycles,
vehicles propelled or drawn by horses or human power, or vehicles
used exclusively on fixed rails or tracks, or cotton trailers
or motorized wheelchairs operated by handicapped persons.
302.060. The director shall not issue any license [hereunder]
and shall deny any driving privilege held pursuant to this
chapter:
(1) To any person who is under the age of eighteen years, if such
person operates a motor vehicle in the transportation of persons
or property as classified in section 302.015;
(2) To any person who is under the age of sixteen years, except
as [hereinafter] provided in section 302.140;
(3) To any person whose license has been suspended, during such
suspension, or to any person whose license has been revoked, until
the expiration of one year after such license was revoked;
(4) To any person who is an habitual drunkard or is addicted to
the use of narcotic drugs;
(5) To any person who has previously been adjudged to be incapacitated
and who at the time of application has not been restored to partial
capacity;
(6) To any person who, when required by this law to take an examination,
has failed to pass such examination;
(7) To any person who has an unsatisfied judgment against [him]
such person, as defined in chapter 303, RSMo, until such
judgment has been satisfied or the financial responsibility of
such person, as defined in section 303.120, RSMo, has been established;
(8) To any person whose application shows that [he]
the person has been convicted within one year prior to
such application of violating the laws of this state relating
to failure to stop after an accident and to disclose [his]
the person's identity or driving a motor vehicle without
the owner's consent;
(9) To any person who has been convicted more than twice of violating
state law, or a county or municipal ordinance[,]
where the judge in such cases was an attorney and the defendant
was represented by or waived the right to an attorney in writing,
relating to driving while intoxicated; except that, after the
expiration of ten years from the date of conviction of the last
offense of violating such law or ordinance relating to driving
while intoxicated, a person who was so convicted may petition
the circuit court of the county in which such last conviction
was rendered and the court shall review the person's habits and
conduct since such conviction. If the court finds that the petitioner
has not been convicted of any offense related to alcohol, controlled
substances or drugs during the preceding ten years and that [his]
the petitioner's habits and conduct show [him]
such petitioner to no longer pose a threat to the public
safety of this state, the court may order the director to issue
a license to the petitioner if [he] the petitioner
is otherwise qualified [under] pursuant to
the provisions of sections 302.010 to 302.540. No person may obtain
a license [under] pursuant to the provisions
of this subdivision through court action more than one time;
(10) To any person who has been convicted twice within a fiveyear
period of violating state law, or a county or municipal
ordinance[,] where the judge in such cases was an
attorney and the defendant was represented by or waived the right
to an attorney in writing, of driving while intoxicated, or who
has been convicted of the crime of involuntary manslaughter while
operating a motor vehicle in an intoxicated condition. The director
shall not issue a license to such person for five years from the
date such person was convicted for involuntary manslaughter while
operating a motor vehicle in an intoxicated condition or for driving
while intoxicated for the second time. Any person who has been
denied a license for two convictions of driving while intoxicated
prior to July 27, 1989, shall have [his] the
person's license issued, upon application, unless the two
convictions occurred within a fiveyear period, in which case,
no license shall be issued to the person for five years from the
date of the second conviction;
(11) To any person who is otherwise disqualified [under]
pursuant to the provisions of sections 302.010 to 302.780,
chapter 303, RSMo, or section 544.046, RSMo.
302.171. 1. Application for a license shall be made upon an approved
form furnished by the director. Every application shall state
the full name, social security number, age, height, weight, color
of eyes, color of hair, sex, residence, mailing address of the
applicant, and the classification for which the applicant has
been licensed, and, if so, when and by what state, and whether
or not such license has ever been suspended, revoked, or disqualified,
and, if revoked, suspended or disqualified, the date and reason
for such suspension, revocation or disqualification and whether
the applicant is making a one dollar donation to promote an organ
donation program as prescribed in subsection 2 of this section.
The application shall also contain such information as the director
may require to enable [him] the director
to determine the applicant's qualification for driving a motor
vehicle; and shall state whether or not the applicant has been
convicted in this or any other state for violating the laws of
this or any other state or any ordinance of any municipality,
relating to careless driving, or driving while intoxicated, or
failing to stop after an accident and disclosing [his]
the applicant's identity, or driving a motor vehicle without
the owner's consent. The application shall contain a certification
by the applicant as to the truth of the facts stated therein.
Every person who applies for a license to operate a motor vehicle
who is less than twenty-one years of age shall be provided with
educational materials relating to the hazards of driving while
intoxicated, including information on penalties imposed by law
for violation of the intoxication-related offenses of the state,
review a video in reference to accidents involving alcohol and
drug abuse; provided by the department of mental health/alcohol
and drug division; but not limited to the department's video,
if other video on the subject is available. The video cost shall
not exceed $3,000 to produce or purchase and distribute to state
video facilities (approximately 60 sites).
2. An applicant for a license may make a donation of one dollar
to promote an organ donor program. The director of revenue shall
collect the donations and deposit all such donations in the state
treasury to the credit of the organ donor program fund established
in sections 194.297 to 194.304, RSMo. Moneys in the organ donor
program fund shall be used solely for the purposes established
in sections 194.297 to 194.304, RSMo, except that the department
of revenue shall retain no more than one percent for its administrative
costs. The donation prescribed in this subsection is voluntary
and may be refused by the applicant for the license at the time
of issuance or renewal of the license. The director shall make
available an informational booklet or other informational sources
on the importance of organ donations to applicants for licensure
as designed by the organ donation advisory committee established
in sections 194.297 to 194.304, RSMo. The director shall inquire
of each applicant at the time the licensee presents the completed
application to the director whether the applicant is interested
in making the one dollar donation prescribed in this subsection
and whether the applicant is interested in making an organ donation
and shall also specifically inform the licensee of the ability
to make an organ donation by completing the form on the reverse
of the license that the applicant will receive in the manner prescribed
by subsection 6 of section 194.240, RSMo. The director shall notify
the department of health of information obtained from applicants
who indicate to the director that they are interested in making
organ donations, and the department of health shall enter only
the complete name and address in the registry established in subsection
1 of section 194.304, RSMo.
302.302. 1. The director of revenue shall put into effect a point
system for the suspension and revocation of licenses. Points shall
be assessed only after a conviction or forfeiture of collateral.
The initial point value is as follows:
(1) Any moving violation of a state law or county or municipal
traffic
ordinance not listed in this section, other than a violation of
vehicle equipment
provisions 2 points
(except any violation of municipal stop sign ordinance where no
accident
is involved 1 point)
(2) Speeding
In violation of a state law 3 points
In violation of a county or municipal ordinance 2 points
(3) Leaving the scene of an accident in violation of section
577.060, RSMo 12 points
In violation of any county or municipal ordinance 6 points
(4) Careless and imprudent driving in violation of subsection
4 of
section 304.016, RSMo 4 points
In violation of a county or municipal ordinance 2 points
(5) Operating without a license after suspension or revocation
and prior
to restoration of operating privileges which have been suspended
or revoked 12 points
(6) Obtaining a license by misrepresentation 12 points
(7) For the first conviction of driving while in an intoxicated
condition
or under the influence of controlled substances or drugs 8 points
(8) For the second or subsequent conviction of driving while in
an
intoxicated condition or under the influence of controlled substances
or drugs
or for the second or any subsequent conviction for driving with
blood
alcohol content of tenhundredths of one percent or more by weight
or,
where the person is less than twenty-one years of age, after
a previous
conviction of driving with a positive blood alcohol content,
as defined in
section 577.012, RSMo, or for the first conviction of driving
while in an
intoxicated condition or under the influence of controlled substances
or drugs
after a previous conviction for driving with blood alcohol content
of tenhundredths
of one percent or more by weight or, where the person is less
than twenty-one
years of age, for the first conviction of driving with a positive
blood alcohol
content, as defined in section 577.012, RSMo, or for the
first conviction
of driving with blood alcohol content of tenhundredths of one
percent or more
by weight or, where the person is less than twenty-one years
of age, for the
first conviction of driving with a positive blood alcohol content,
as defined in
section 577.012, RSMo, after a previous conviction for
driving while in an
intoxicated condition or under the influence of controlled substances
or
drugs 12 points
(9) For the first conviction for driving with blood alcohol content
of
tenhundredths of one percent or more by weight or, where the
person is less
than twenty-one years of age, for the first conviction of driving
with a positive
blood alcohol content, as defined in section 577.012, RSMo
In violation of state law 6 points
In violation of a county or municipal ordinance 6 points
(10) Any felony involving the use of a motor vehicle 12 points
(11) Knowingly permitting unlicensed operator to operate a motor
vehicle 4 points
2. An additional two points shall be assessed when personal injury
or property damage results from any violation listed in subsection
1 of this section and if found to be warranted and certified by
the reporting court.
3. When any of the acts listed in subdivision (2), (3), (4) or
(7) of subsection 1 of this section constitutes both a violation
of a state law and a violation of a county or municipal ordinance,
points may be assessed for either violation but not for both.
Notwithstanding that an offense arising out of the same occurrence
could be construed to be a violation of subdivisions (7), (8)
and (9) of subsection 1 of this section, no person shall be tried
or convicted for more than one offense [under] pursuant
to subdivisions (7), (8) and (9) of subsection 1 of this section
for offenses arising out of the same occurrence.
4. The director of revenue shall put into effect a system for
staying the assessment of points against an operator. The system
shall provide that the satisfactory completion of a driver improvement
program or, in the case of violations committed while operating
a motorcycle, a motorcycle rider training course approved by the
director of the department of public safety, by an operator, when
so ordered and verified by any court having jurisdiction over
any law of this state or county or municipal ordinance, regulating
motor vehicles, other than a violation committed in a commercial
motor vehicle as defined in section 302.700, shall be accepted
by the director in lieu of the assessment of points for a violation
[under] pursuant to subdivision (1), (2),
or (4) of subsection 1 of this section or [under]
pursuant to subsection 2 of this section. For the purposes
of this subsection, the driver improvement program shall meet
or exceed the standards of the National Safety Council's eighthour
"Defensive Driving Course" or, in the case of a violation
which occurred during the operation of a motorcycle, the program
shall meet the standards established by the director of the department
of public safety under sections 302.133 to 302.138. The completion
of a driver improvement program or a motorcycle rider training
course shall not be accepted in lieu of points more than one time
in any thirtysixmonth period and must be completed within sixty
days of the date of conviction in order to be accepted in lieu
of the assessment of points. Every court having jurisdiction [under]
pursuant to the provisions of this subsection shall, within
fifteen days after completion of the driver improvement program
or motorcycle rider training course by an operator, forward a
record of the completion to the director, all other provisions
of the law to the contrary notwithstanding. The director shall
establish procedures for record keeping and the administration
of this subsection.
302.309. 1. Whenever any license is suspended [under]
pursuant to sections 302.302 to 302.309, the director of
revenue shall return the license to the operator immediately upon
the termination of the period of suspension and upon compliance
with the requirements of chapter 303, RSMo.
2. Any operator whose license is revoked [under these]
pursuant to sections 302.302 to 302.309, upon the
termination of the period of revocation, shall apply for a new
license in the manner prescribed by law.
3. [(1) All circuit courts] The director of revenue
shall have jurisdiction to hear applications [for hardship]
and make eligibility determinations granting limited driving
privileges[, and such applications may be heard and determined
by either circuit or associate circuit judges]. Such
application shall be made in writing to the director of revenue
and the person's reasons for requesting the limited driving privileges
shall be made therein.
[(2)] 4. When [any court of record
having jurisdiction] the director of revenue finds
that an operator is required to operate a motor vehicle in connection
with any of the following:
[(a)] (1) A business, occupation, or employment;
[(b)] (2) Seeking medical treatment for [himself]
such operator;
[(c)] (3) Attending school or other institution
of higher education;
[(d)] (4) Attending alcohol or drug treatment
programs; or
[(e)] (5) Any other circumstance the [court]
director finds would create an undue hardship on the operator;
the [court] director may grant such limited
driving privilege as the circumstances of the case justify if
the [court] director finds undue hardship
would result to the individual, and while so operating a motor
vehicle within the restrictions and limitations of the [court
order] limited driving privileges the driver shall
not be guilty of operating a motor vehicle without a valid license.
[(3) An operator may make application to the proper court
in the county in which such operator resides or in the county
in which is located his principal place of business or employment.]
5. Any person who has received notice of denial of a request
for limited driving privileges by the director of revenue may
make a request for a review of the director's determination in
the circuit court of the county in which the person resides or
the county in which is located the person's principal place of
business or employment within thirty days of the date of mailing
of the notice of denial. Such review shall be based solely upon
the records of the department of revenue and shall be limited
to a review of whether the applicant was entitled to the limited
driving privileges as a matter of law.
6. Any application for a [hardship] limited
driving privilege [shall name the director as a party defendant
and] shall be served upon the director prior to the grant
of any limited privileges[, and shall be accompanied by
a copy of the applicant's driving record as certified by the director].
Any [application by such operator] applicant
for a [hardship] limited driving privilege
shall [also be accompanied by] have on file with
the department of revenue proof of financial responsibility
as required by chapter 303, RSMo. Any application by a person
who transports persons or property as classified in section 302.015
may be accompanied by proof of financial responsibility as required
by chapter 303, RSMo, but if proof of financial responsibility
does not accompany the application, the [court in its]
director has discretion [may] to grant
the [hardship] limited driving privilege
to the person solely for the purpose of operating a vehicle whose
owner has complied with chapter 303, RSMo, for that vehicle, and
the [court's order] limited driving privilege
must state such restriction. When operating such vehicle under
such restriction the person [must] shall
carry proof that the owner has complied with chapter 303, RSMo,
for that vehicle.
[(4)] 7. The [court order granting
the hardship] director's grant of the limited driving
privilege shall indicate the termination date of the [order]
privilege, which shall be not later than the end of the
period of suspension or revocation. [A copy of the order
shall be sent by the clerk of the court to the director, and a
copy shall be given to the driver which shall be carried by him
whenever he operates] The director of revenue shall
give a copy of the limited driving privilege to the applicant.
The applicant shall carry a copy of the limited driving privilege
while operating a motor vehicle. A conviction which results
in the assessment of points under the provisions of section 302.302,
other than a violation of a municipal stop sign ordinance where
no accident is involved, against a driver who is operating a vehicle
under the authority of a [court order] limited
driving privilege terminates the [order, and the court
in which the conviction occurs shall immediately so notify the
driver, the director and the court which granted the order.]
privilege, as of the date the points are assessed to the person's
driving record. If the date of arrest is prior to the issuance
of the limited driving privilege, the privilege shall not be terminated.
The director shall notify by ordinary mail the driver whose privilege
is so terminated.
[(5) Except as provided in subdivision (6) of this subsection,]
8. No person is eligible to receive hardship driving privilege
whose license has been suspended or revoked for the following
reasons:
[(a)] (1) Who has been convicted of violating
the provisions of section 577.010 or 577.012, RSMo, or any similar
provision of any federal[,] or state[,]
law, or a municipal or county law[,] where
the judge in such case was an attorney and the defendant was represented
by or waived the right to an attorney in writing, until the person
has completed the first thirty days of a suspension or revocation
imposed [under] pursuant to this chapter;
[(b)] (2) Who has been convicted of any felony
in the commission of which a motor vehicle was used;
[(c)] (3) Who at the time [he]
the person applies for such [hardship] limited
driving privilege would not be eligible for a license because
of the provisions of subdivision (1), (2), (4), (5), (6), (7),
(8), (9), (10) or (11) of section 302.060;
[(d)] (4) Because of operating a motor vehicle
under the influence of narcotic drugs, a controlled substance
as defined in chapter 195, RSMo, or having left the scene of an
accident as provided in section 577.060, RSMo;
[(e)] (5) Who at the time [he]
the person applies for a [hardship] limited
driving privilege has previously been granted such a privilege
within the period of five years next preceding such application;
[(f)] (6) Whose license has been revoked for the first
time for failure to submit to a chemical test pursuant to section
577.041, RSMo, or for a refusal to submit to a chemical test in
any other state, and who has not completed the first ninety days
of such revocation;
[(g)] (7) Who has violated more than once
the provisions of section 577.041, RSMo, or a similar implied
consent law of any other state;
[(h)] (8) Who has had [his]
the person's commercial driver's license disqualified [under]
pursuant to sections 302.700 to 302.780[. However];
except that, nothing in this subsection shall prevent a person
holding a commercial driver's license who is suspended or revoked
as a result of an action occurring while not driving a commercial
motor vehicle or driving for pay, but while driving in an individual
capacity as an operator of a personal vehicle from applying for
hardship driving privileges to operate a commercial vehicle, if
otherwise eligible for such hardship privilege; or
[(i)] (9) Who has received a suspension [under]
pursuant to subsection 2 of section 302.525 and who has
not completed the first thirty days of such suspension, provided
[he] the person is not otherwise ineligible
for [hardship] limited driving privileges;
or who has received a revocation under subsection 2 of section
302.525 and who has not completed such revocation.
[(6) (a) A circuit court] 9. Provided that pursuant
to the provisions of this section the applicant is not otherwise
ineligible for a limited driving privilege, the director may,
in the manner prescribed in [this subsection] subsections
3 to 8 of this section, allow a person who has had [his]
such person's license to operate a motor vehicle revoked
where that person cannot obtain a new license for a period of
ten years, as prescribed in subdivision (9) of section 302.060,
to apply for limited driving privileges [under]
pursuant to subsections 3 to 8 of this [subsection]
section if such person has served at least three years
of such disqualification or revocation. Such [a]
person shall present evidence satisfactory to the [court]
director that such person has not been convicted of any
offense related to alcohol, controlled substances or drugs during
the preceding three years and that [his] the
person's habits and conduct show that the person no longer
poses a threat to the public safety of this state[;].
[(b) A circuit court] 10. Provided that pursuant
to the provisions of this section, the applicant is not otherwise
ineligible for a limited driving privilege, the director may,
in the manner prescribed in [this subsection] subsections
3 to 8 of this section, allow a person who has had [his]
such person's license to operate a motor vehicle revoked
where that person cannot obtain a new license for a period of
five years because of two convictions for driving while intoxicated,
as prescribed in subdivision (10) of section 302.060, to apply
for limited driving privileges [under] pursuant
to subsections 3 to 8 of this [subsection] section
if such person has served at least two years of such disqualification
or revocation. Such [a] person shall present evidence
satisfactory to the [court] director that
such person has not been convicted of any offense related to alcohol,
controlled substances or drugs during the preceding two years
and that [his] the person's habits and conduct
show that the person no longer poses a threat to the public safety
of this state.
11. Any person who is denied a license permanently in this
state because of an alcoholrelated conviction subsequent to a
restoration of [his] such person's driving
privileges [under] pursuant to subdivision
(9) of section 302.060 shall not be eligible for limited driving
privileges [under] pursuant to the provisions
of this [subdivision] section.
12. The director of revenue shall promulgate rules and regulations
necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.
302.312. 1. Copies of all papers, documents, and records lawfully
deposited or filed in the offices of the department of revenue
or the bureau of vital records of the department of health and
copies of any records, properly certified by the appropriate custodian
or the director, shall be admissible as evidence in all courts
of this state and in all administrative proceedings. [Before
being admitted in evidence, the record shall be identified and
proper foundation shall be laid.]
2. A computer terminal printout of an individual driving record
through the Missouri uniform law enforcement system from the department
of revenue database, certified by an officer of the local law
enforcement agency, shall be admissible in evidence in all courts
of this state. A local law enforcement agency equipped with a
computer terminal shall provide a motor vehicle driver with a
copy of such printout relating to the license of [same]
such motor vehicle driver upon the execution of a written
request. The local law enforcement agency may charge an administrative
fee not to exceed five dollars per copy.
302.500. As used in sections 302.500 to [302.540]
302.541, the following terms mean:
(1) "Alcohol concentration", the amount of alcohol in
a person's blood at the time of the act alleged as shown by chemical
analysis of the person's blood, breath, saliva or urine;
(2) "Department", the department of revenue of the state
of Missouri;
(3) "Director", the director of the department of revenue
or [his] the director's authorized representative;
(4) "Driver's license" or "license", a license,
permit, or privilege to drive a motor vehicle issued under or
granted by the laws of this state. The term includes any temporary
license or instruction permit, any nonresident operating privilege,
and the privilege of any person to drive a motor vehicle whether
or not the person holds a valid license;
(5) "Measurable and detectable amount of alcohol",
alcohol concentration in a person's blood or breath of at least
two-hundredths of one percent by weight;
(6) "Revocation", the termination by formal action
of the department of a person's license. A revoked license is
not subject to renewal or restoration except that an application
for a new license may be presented and acted upon by the department
after the expiration of the revocation period;
[(6)] (7) "State", a state, territory,
or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any province of Canada;
[(7)] (8) "Suspension", the temporary
withdrawal by formal action of the department of a person's license.
The suspension shall be for a period specifically designated by
the department pursuant to the provisions of sections 302.500
to [302.540] 302.541.
302.505. 1. The department shall suspend or revoke the license
of any person upon its determination that the person was arrested
upon probable cause to believe [he] such person
was driving a motor vehicle while the alcohol concentration in
the person's blood [or], breath, or urine
was tenhundredths of one percent or more by weight [of
alcohol in his blood], based on the definition of alcohol
concentration in section 302.500, or where such person was
arrested upon probable cause to believe such person was driving
with a positive blood alcohol content, pursuant to section 577.012,
RSMo.
2. The department shall make a determination of [these]
the facts provided in sub-section 1 of this section
on the basis of the report of a law enforcement officer required
in section 302.510, and [this] such determination
shall be final unless a hearing is requested and held. If a hearing
is held, the department shall review the matter and make a final
determination on the basis of evidence received at the hearing.
3. The determination of [these] such facts
by the department is independent of the determination of the same
or similar facts in the adjudication of any criminal charges arising
out of the same occurrence. The disposition of [those]
such criminal charges shall not affect any suspension or
revocation [under] pursuant to this section.
302.510. 1. Except as provided in subsection 3 of this section,
a law enforcement officer who arrests any person for a violation
of [section 577.010 or 577.012, RSMo,] any state
statute related to driving while intoxicated or for a violation
of a county or municipal ordinance prohibiting driving while intoxicated
or a county or municipal alcohol related traffic offense, and
in which the alcohol concentration in the person's blood [or],
breath, or urine was tenhundredths of one percent or more
by weight or where such person was at the time of the arrest
less than twenty-one years of age and where there was a measurable
and detectable amount of alcohol in the person's blood or breath,
shall forward to the department a verified report of all information
relevant to the enforcement action, including information which
adequately identifies the arrested person, a statement of the
officer's grounds for belief that the person violated [section
577.010 or 577.012, RSMo,] any state statute related
to driving while intoxicated or a county or municipal ordinance
prohibiting driving while intoxicated or a county or municipal
alcohol related traffic offense, a report of the results of any
chemical tests which were conducted, and a copy of the citation
and complaint filed with the court.
2. The report required by this section shall be made on forms
supplied by the department or in a manner specified by regulations
of the department.
3. A county or municipal ordinance prohibiting driving while intoxicated
or a county or municipal alcohol related traffic offense may not
be the basis for suspension or revocation of a driver's license
pursuant to sections 302.500 to [302.540] 302.541,
unless the arresting law enforcement officer, other than an elected
peace officer or official, has been certified by the director
of the department of public safety pursuant to the provisions
of sections 590.100 to [590.150] 590.180,
RSMo.
302.520. 1. Whenever the chemical test results are available to
the law enforcement officer while the arrested person is still
in custody, and where the results show an alcohol concentration
of tenhundredths of one percent or more by weight of alcohol in
[his] such person's blood or where such
person is less than twenty-one years of age and the results show
that there is a measurable and detectable amount of alcohol in
the person's blood, the officer, acting on behalf of the department,
shall serve the notice of suspension or revocation personally
on the arrested person.
2. When the law enforcement officer serves the notice of suspension
or revocation, the officer shall take possession of any driver's
license issued by this state which is held by the person. When
the officer takes possession of a valid driver's license issued
by this state, the officer, acting on behalf of the department,
shall issue a temporary permit which is valid for fifteen days
after its date of issuance and shall also give the person arrested
a notice which shall inform [him of his] the
person of all rights and responsibilities [under]
pursuant to sections 302.500 to [302.540]
302.541. The notice shall be in such form so that the arrested
person may sign the original as evidence of [his]
receipt thereof. The notice shall also contain a detachable form
permitting the arrested person to request a hearing. Signing the
hearing request form and mailing such request to the department
shall constitute a formal application for a hearing.
3. A copy of the completed notice of suspension or revocation
form, a copy of any completed temporary permit form, a copy of
the notice of rights and responsibilities given to the arrested
person, including any request for hearing, and any driver's license
taken into possession [under] pursuant to
this section shall be forwarded to the department by the officer
along with the report required in section 302.510.
4. The department shall provide forms for notice of suspension
or revocation, for notice of rights and responsibilities, for
request for a hearing and for temporary permits to law enforcement
agencies.
302.530. 1. Any person who has received a notice of suspension
or revocation may make a request within fifteen days of receipt
of the notice for a review of the department's determination at
a hearing. If the person's driver's license has not been previously
surrendered, it [must] shall be surrendered
at the time the request for a hearing is made.
2. At the time the request for a hearing is made, if it appears
from the record that the person is the holder of a valid driver's
license issued by this state, and that the driver's license has
been surrendered as required, the department shall issue a temporary
permit which [will] shall be valid until
the scheduled date for the hearing. The department may later issue
an additional temporary permit or permits in order to stay the
effective date of the suspension or revocation until the final
order is issued following the hearing, as required by section
302.520.
3. The hearing [shall] may be held by
telephone, or if requested by the person, such person's attorney
or representative, in the county where the arrest was made.
The hearing shall be conducted by examiners who are licensed to
practice law in the state of Missouri and who are employed by
the department on a parttime or fulltime basis as the department
may determine.
4. The sole issue at the hearing shall be whether by a preponderance
of the evidence the person was driving a vehicle [under]
pursuant to the circumstances set out in section 302.505.
The burden of proof shall be on the state to adduce such evidence.
If the department finds the affirmative of this issue, the suspension
or revocation order shall be sustained. If the department finds
the negative of the issue, the suspension or revocation order
shall be rescinded.
5. The procedure at such hearing shall be conducted in accordance
with chapter 536, RSMo, not otherwise in conflict with sections
302.500 to 302.540.
6. The department shall promptly notify, by certified letter,
the person of its decision including the reasons for that decision.
Such notification shall include a notice advising the person that
the department's decision shall be final within fifteen days from
the date of certification of the letter unless the person challenges
the department's decision within that time period by filing an
appeal in the circuit court in the county where the arrest occurred.
7. Unless the person, within fifteen days after being notified
by certified letter of the department's decision, files an appeal
for judicial review pursuant to section 302.535, the decision
of the department shall be final.
8. The director may adopt any rules and regulations necessary
to carry out the provisions of this section.
302.535. 1. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the department
may file a petition for trial de novo by the circuit court. The
burden of proof shall be on the state to adduce the evidence.
Such trial shall be conducted pursuant to the Missouri rules of
civil procedure and not as an appeal of an administrative decision
pursuant to chapter 536, RSMo. The petition shall be filed in
the circuit court of the county where the arrest occurred. The
case shall be decided by the judge sitting without a jury. The
presiding judge of the circuit court may assign a traffic judge,
pursuant to section 479.500, RSMo 1994, a circuit judge or
an associate circuit judge to hear such petition.
2. The filing of a petition for trial de novo shall not result
in a stay of the suspension or revocation order. But upon the
filing of such petition, a restricted driving privilege for the
limited purpose of driving in connection with the petitioner's
business, occupation, employment, or formal program of secondary,
postsecondary or higher education shall be issued by the department
if the person's driving record shows no prior alcohol related
enforcement contact during the immediately preceding five years.
Such limited driving privilege shall terminate on the date of
the disposition of the petition for trial de novo.
3. In addition to the limited driving privilege as permitted in
subsection 2 of this section, the department may upon the filing
of a petition for trial de novo issue a restricted driving privilege
for the limited purpose of driving in connection with the petitioner's
business, occupation, employment, or formal program of secondary,
postsecondary or higher education. In determining whether to issue
such a restrictive driving privilege, the department shall consider
the number and the seriousness of prior convictions and the entire
driving record of the driver.
4. Such time of restricted driving privilege pending disposition
of trial de novo shall be counted toward any time of restricted
driving privilege imposed pursuant to section 302.525. Nothing
in this subsection shall be construed to prevent a person from
maintaining his restricted driving privilege for an additional
sixty days in order to meet the conditions imposed by section
302.540 for reinstating a person's driver's license.
302.541. 1. In addition to other fees required by law,
any person who has had [his] a license to
operate a motor vehicle suspended or revoked following a determination,
[under] pursuant to section 302.505[,
RSMo], or section 577.010, 577.012, 577.041
or 577.510, RSMo, or any county or municipal ordinance, where
the judge in such case was an attorney and the defendant was represented
by or waived the right to an attorney, that [he]
such person was driving while intoxicated or with a blood
alcohol content of tenhundredths of one percent or more by weight
or, where such person was at the time of the arrest less than
twenty-one years of age, was driving with a measurable and detectable
amount of alcohol in the person's blood shall pay an additional
fee of twentyfive dollars prior to the reinstatement or reissuance
of [his] the license.
2. Any person less than twenty-one years of age whose driving
privilege has been suspended or revoked solely for a first determination
pursuant to sections 302.500 to 302.540 that such person was driving
a motor vehicle with a measurable and detectable amount of alcohol
in the person's blood is exempt from filing proof of financial
responsibility with the department of revenue in accordance with
chapter 303, RSMo, as a prerequisite for reinstatement of driving
privileges or obtaining a restricted driving privilege as provided
by section 302.525.
311.310. Any licensee [under] pursuant to
this chapter, or [his] the licensee's employee,
who shall sell, vend, give away or otherwise supply any intoxicating
liquor in any quantity whatsoever to any person under the age
of twentyone years, or to any person intoxicated or appearing
to be in a state of intoxication, or to a habitual drunkard, and
any person whomsoever except [his] the person's
parent or guardian who shall knowingly procure for, sell,
give away or otherwise supply intoxicating liquor to any person
under the age of twentyone years, or to any intoxicated person
or any person appearing to be in a state of intoxication, or to
a habitual drunkard, shall be deemed guilty of a class A
misdemeanor, except that this section shall not apply to the supplying
of intoxicating liquor to a person under the age of twentyone
years for medical purposes only, or to the administering of such
intoxicating liquor to any person by a duly licensed physician.
No person shall be denied a license or renewal of a license issued
[under] pursuant to this chapter solely due
to a conviction for unlawful sale or supply to a minor when serving
in the capacity as an employee of a licensed establishment.
311.325. Any person under the age of twentyone years, who purchases
or attempts to purchase, or has in [his] the
person's possession or consumes, any intoxicating liquor
as defined in section 311.020 is guilty of a misdemeanor. For
purposes of prosecution [under] pursuant to
this section or any other provision of this chapter involving
an alleged illegal sale or transfer of intoxicating liquor to
a person under twentyone years of age, a manufacturersealed container
describing that there is intoxicating liquor therein need not
be opened or the contents therein tested to verify that there
is intoxicating liquor in such container. The alleged violator
may allege that there was not intoxicating liquor in such container,
but the burden of proof of such allegation is on such person,
as it shall be presumed that such a sealed container describing
that there is intoxicating liquor therein contains intoxicating
liquor.
312.407. Any person under the age of twentyone years, who purchases
or attempts to purchase, or has in [his] the
person's possession or consumes, any nonintoxicating
beer as defined in section 312.010, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
For purposes of prosecution [under] pursuant
to this section or any other provision of this chapter involving
an alleged illegal sale or transfer of nonintoxicating beer to
a person under twentyone years of age, a manufacturersealed container
describing that there is nonintoxicating beer therein need not
be opened or the contents therein tested to verify that there
is nonintoxicating beer in such container. The alleged violator
may allege that there was not nonintoxicating beer in such container,
but the burden of proof of such allegation is on such person,
as it shall be presumed that such a sealed container describing
that there is nonintoxicating beer therein contains nonintoxicating
beer.
479.500. 1. In the twentyfirst judicial circuit, a majority of
the circuit judges, en banc, may establish a traffic court, which
shall be a division of the circuit court, and may authorize the
appointment of not more than three municipal judges who shall
be known as traffic judges. The traffic judges shall be appointed
by a traffic court judicial commission consisting of the presiding
judge of the circuit, who shall be the chair, one circuit judge
elected by the circuit judges, one associate circuit judge elected
by the associate circuit judges of the circuit, and two members
appointed by the county executive of St. Louis County, each of
whom shall represent one of the two political parties casting
the highest number of votes at the next preceding gubernatorial
election. The procedures and operations of the traffic court judicial
commission shall be established by circuit court rule.
2. Traffic judges may be authorized to act as commissioners
to hear in the first instance nonfelony violations of state law
involving motor vehicles, and such other offenses as may be provided
by circuit court rule. Traffic judges may also be authorized to
hear in the first instance violations of county and municipal
ordinances involving motor vehicles, and other county ordinance
violations, as provided by circuit court rule.
[2.] 3. In the event that a county municipal court
is established pursuant to section 66.010, RSMo, which takes jurisdiction
of county ordinance violations the circuit court may then authorize
the appointment of no more than one traffic judge authorized to
hear municipal ordinance violations other than county ordinance
violations, and to act as commissioner to hear in the first instance
nonfelony violations of state law involving motor vehicles, and
such other offenses as may be provided by rule. These traffic
court judges also may be authorized to act as commissioners to
hear in the first instance petitions to review decisions of the
department of revenue or the director of revenue filed pursuant
to sections 302.309, 302.311, 302.535 and 302.750, RSMo.
[3.] 4. In establishing a traffic court, the circuit
may be divided into such sectors as may be established by a majority
of the circuit and associate circuit judges, en banc. The
traffic court in each sector shall hear those cases arising within
the territorial limits of the sector unless a case arising within
another sector is transferred as provided by operating procedures.
[4.] 5. Traffic judges shall be licensed to practice
law in this state and shall serve at the pleasure of a majority
of the circuit judges, en banc, and shall be residents of St.
Louis County, and shall receive from the state as annual compensation
an amount equal to onethird of the annual compensation of an associate
circuit judge. Each judge shall devote approximately onethird
of his working time to the performance of his duties as a traffic
judge. Traffic judges shall not accept or handle cases in their
practice of law which are inconsistent with their duties as a
traffic judge and shall not be a judge or prosecutor for any other
court. Traffic judges shall not be considered state employees
and shall not be members of the state employees' or judicial retirement
system or be eligible to receive any other employment benefit
accorded state employees or judges.
[5.] 6. A majority of the judges, en banc, shall
establish operating procedures for the traffic court which shall
provide for regular sessions in the evenings after 6:00 p.m. and
for Saturday or other sessions as efficient operation and convenience
to the public may require. Proceedings in the traffic court,
except when a judge is acting as a commissioner pursuant to this
section, shall be conducted as provided in supreme court rule
37. The hearing shall be before a traffic judge without jury,
and the judge shall assume an affirmative duty to determine the
merits of the evidence presented and the defenses of the defendant
and may question parties and witnesses. No term of imprisonment
or confinement may be assessed by a traffic judge. In the event
a jury trial is requested, the cause shall be certified to the
circuit court for trial by jury as otherwise provided by law.
Clerks and computer personnel shall be assigned as needed for
the efficient operation of the court.
[6.] 7. In establishing operating procedure, provisions
shall be made for appropriate circumstances whereby defendants
may enter not guilty pleas and obtain trial dates by telephone
or written communication without personal appearance, or to plead
guilty and deliver by mail or electronic transfer or other approved
method the specified amount of the fine and costs as otherwise
provided by law, within a specified period of time.
[7.] 8. Operating procedures shall be provided for
electronic recording of proceedings, except that if adequate recording
equipment is not provided at county expense, then, in that event,
a person aggrieved by a judgment of a traffic judge or commissioner
shall have the right of a trial de novo. The procedures for perfecting
the right of a trial de novo shall be the same as that provided
under sections 512.180 to 512.320, RSMo, except that the provisions
of subsection 2 of section 512.180, RSMo, shall not apply to such
cases.
[8. On August 28, 1992, the] 9. The circuit court
shall only have the authority to appoint one commissioner with
the jurisdiction provided in subsection [2] 3 of
this section. [Six months after August 28, 1992, in the
event that the county has not established a county municipal court
which has taken jurisdiction of county ordinance violations, the
circuit court shall then have the authority to appoint the additional
traffic judges with jurisdiction over county ordinance violations
as provided in this section.]
[9.] 10. All costs to establish and operate a county
municipal court under section 66.010, RSMo, and this section shall
be borne by such county.
577.012. 1. A person commits the crime of "driving with excessive
blood alcohol content" if [he] such person
operates a motor vehicle in this state with tenhundredths of one
percent or more by weight of alcohol in [his] such
person's blood.
2. A person is guilty of "driving with a positive blood
alcohol content" if such person is less than twenty-one years
of age and operates a motor vehicle in this state with any measurable
and detectable amount of alcohol in such person's blood.
3. As used in this section, percent by weight of alcohol
in the blood shall be based upon grams of alcohol per one hundred
milliliters of blood and may be shown by chemical analysis of
the person's blood, breath, saliva or urine. For the purposes
of determining the alcoholic content of a person's blood [under]
pursuant to this section, the test shall be conducted in
accordance with the provisions of sections 577.020 to 577.041.
As used in this section, the term "any measurable and
detectable amount of alcohol" means alcohol concentration
in a person's blood or breath of at least two-hundredths of one
percent by weight.
[3.] 4. For the first offense, driving with
excessive blood alcohol content is a class C misdemeanor.
5. For the first offense, driving with a positive blood alcohol
content is an infraction.
6. A person may not be charged with driving with excessive
blood alcohol content and driving with a positive blood alcohol
content for conduct arising out of the same incident.
577.020. 1. Any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public
highways of this state shall be deemed to have given consent to,
subject to the provisions of sections 577.020 to 577.041, a chemical
test or tests of [his] the person's breath,
blood, saliva or urine for the purpose of determining the alcohol
or drug content of [his] the person's blood
if arrested for any offense arising out of acts which the arresting
officer had reasonable grounds to believe were committed while
the person was driving a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated
or drugged condition. The test shall be administered at the direction
of the arresting law enforcement officer whenever the person has
been arrested for the offense.
2. The implied consent to submit to the chemical tests listed
in subsection 1 of this section shall be limited to not more than
two such tests arising from the same arrest, incident or charge.
3. Chemical analysis of the person's breath, blood, saliva, or
urine to be considered valid [under] pursuant
to the provisions of sections 577.020 to 577.041 shall be
performed according to methods approved by the state department
of health by licensed medical personnel or by a person possessing
a valid permit issued by the state department of health for this
purpose.
4. The state department of health shall approve satisfactory techniques,
devices, equipment, or methods to be considered valid [under]
pursuant to the provisions of sections 577.020 to 577.041
and shall establish standards to ascertain the qualifications
and competence of individuals to conduct analyses and to issue
permits which shall be subject to termination or revocation by
the state department of health.
5. The person tested may have a physician, or a qualified technician,
chemist, registered nurse, or other qualified person [of
his own choosing and at his expense] at the choosing
and expense of the person to be tested, administer a test
in addition to any administered at the direction of a law enforcement
officer. The failure or inability to obtain an additional test
by a person shall not preclude the admission of evidence relating
to the test taken at the direction of a law enforcement officer.
6. Upon the request of the person who is tested, full information
concerning the test shall be made available to him.
7. Any person given a chemical test of the person's breath
pursuant to subsection 1 of this section may be videotaped during
such test at the direction of the arresting law enforcement officer.
Any such video recording made during the chemical test pursuant
to this subsection shall be admissible as evidence at either any
trial of such person for either a violation of any state law or
county or municipal ordinance, or any license revocation or suspension
proceeding pursuant to the provisions of chapter 302, RSMo.
577.021. A member of the state highway patrol may, prior to arrest,
administer a chemical test to any person suspected of operating
a motor vehicle in violation of section 577.010 or 577.012. A
test administered pursuant to this section shall be admissible
as evidence of probable cause to arrest and as exculpatory evidence,
but shall not be admissible as evidence of blood alcohol content.
The provisions of section 577.020 shall not apply to a test administered
prior to arrest pursuant to this section. [This section
shall terminate on June 30, 1996.]
577.023. 1. For purposes of this section, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise:
(1) An "intoxicationrelated traffic offense" is driving
while intoxicated, driving with excessive blood alcohol content,
or driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs in violation
of state law or a county or municipal ordinance, where the judge
in such case was an attorney and the defendant was represented
by or waived the right to an attorney in writing;
(2) A "persistent offender" is a person who has either:
(a) Pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of two or
more intoxicationrelated traffic offenses, where such two or more
offenses occurred within ten years of the occurrence of the intoxicationrelated
traffic offense for which the person is charged; [and]
or
(b) Pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of an intoxication-related
traffic offense as a persistent offender at any time prior to
the occurrence of the intoxication-related traffic offense for
which the person is charged; or
(c) Pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of any homicide
offense related to operating a motor vehicle in an intoxicated
or drugged condition at any time prior to the occurrence of the
intoxication-related traffic offense for which the person is charged;
or
(d) Pleaded guilty to or has been found guilty of any felony
assault offense related to operating a motor vehicle in an intoxicated
or drugged condition at any time prior to the occurrence of the
intoxication-related traffic offense for which the person is charged;
(3) A "prior offender" is a person who has pleaded guilty
to or has been found guilty of one intoxicationrelated traffic
offense, where such prior offense occurred within [five
years] twelve months of the occurrence of the intoxicationrelated
traffic offense for which the person is charged.
2. Any person who pleads guilty to or is found guilty of a violation
of section 577.010 or 577.012 who is alleged and proved to be
a prior offender shall be guilty of a class [A misdemeanor]
D felony.
3. Any person who pleads guilty to or is found guilty of a violation
of section 577.010 or 577.012 who is alleged and proved to be
a persistent offender shall be guilty of a class D felony.
4. No court shall suspend the imposition of sentence as to a prior
or persistent offender [under] pursuant to
this section nor sentence such person to pay a fine in lieu of
a term of imprisonment, section 557.011, RSMo, to the contrary
notwithstanding, nor shall such person be eligible for parole
or probation until [he] the person has served
a minimum of fortyeight consecutive hours' imprisonment, unless
as a condition of such parole or probation such person performs
at least ten days of community service under the supervision of
the court in those jurisdictions which have a recognized program
for community service.
5. The court shall find the defendant to be a prior offender or
persistent offender, if:
(1) The indictment or information, original or amended, or the
information in lieu of an indictment pleads all essential facts
warranting a finding that the defendant is a prior offender or
persistent offender; and
(2) Evidence is introduced that establishes sufficient facts pleaded
to warrant a finding beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant is
a prior offender or persistent offender; and
(3) The court makes findings of fact that warrant a finding beyond
a reasonable doubt by the court that the defendant is a prior
offender or persistent offender.
6. In a jury trial, the facts shall be pleaded, established and
found prior to submission to the jury outside of its hearing.
7. In a trial without a jury or upon a plea of guilty, the court
may defer the proof in findings of such facts to a later time,
but prior to sentencing.
8. The defendant shall be accorded full rights of confrontation
and crossexamination, with the opportunity to present evidence,
at such hearings.
9. The defendant may waive proof of the facts alleged.
10. Nothing in this section shall prevent the use of presentence
investigations or commitments.
11. At the sentencing hearing both the state and the defendant
shall be permitted to present additional information bearing on
the issue of sentence.
12. The pleas or findings of guilty shall be prior to the date
of commission of the present offense.
13. The court shall not instruct the jury as to the range of punishment
or allow the jury, upon a finding of guilty, to assess and declare
the punishment as part of its verdict in cases of prior offenders
or persistent offenders.
14. Evidence of prior convictions shall be heard and determined
by the trial court out of the hearing of the jury prior to the
submission of the case to the jury, and shall include but not
be limited to evidence of convictions received by a search of
the records of the Missouri uniform law enforcement system maintained
by the Missouri state highway patrol. After hearing the evidence,
the court shall enter its findings thereon. A conviction of a
violation of a municipal or county ordinance in a county or municipal
court for driving while intoxicated or a conviction or a plea
of guilty or a finding of guilty followed by a suspended imposition
of sentence, suspended execution of sentence, probation or parole
or any combination thereof in a state court shall be treated as
a prior conviction.
577.037. 1. Upon the trial of any person for violation of any
of the provisions of section 565.024, RSMo, or section 565.060,
RSMo, or section 577.010 or 577.012, or upon the trial of any
criminal action or violations of county or municipal ordinances
or in any license suspension or revocation proceeding pursuant
to the provisions of chapter 302, RSMo, arising out of acts alleged
to have been committed by any person while driving a motor vehicle
while in an intoxicated condition, the amount of alcohol in the
person's blood at the time of the act alleged as shown by any
chemical analysis of the person's blood, breath, saliva or urine
is admissible in evidence and the provisions of subdivision (5)
of section 491.060, RSMo, shall not prevent the admissibility
or introduction of such evidence if otherwise admissible. If there
were tenhundredths of one percent or more by weight of alcohol
in the person's blood, this shall be prima facie evidence that
the person was intoxicated at the time the specimen was taken.
2. Percent by weight of alcohol in the blood shall be based upon
grams of alcohol per one hundred milliliters of blood or grams
of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of breath.
3. The foregoing provisions of this section shall not be construed
as limiting the introduction of any other competent evidence bearing
upon the question whether the person was intoxicated.
4. A chemical analysis of a person's breath, blood, saliva or
urine, in order to give rise to the presumption or to have the
effect provided for in subsection 1 of this section, shall have
been performed as provided in sections 577.020 to 577.041 and
in accordance with methods and standards approved by the state
department of health.
5. Any charge alleging a violation of section 577.010 or 577.012
or any county or municipal ordinance prohibiting driving while
intoxicated or driving under the influence of alcohol shall be
dismissed with prejudice if a chemical analysis of the defendant's
breath, blood, saliva, or urine performed in accordance with sections
577.020 to 577.041 and rules promulgated thereunder by the state
department of health demonstrate that there was less than tenhundredths
of one percent of alcohol in the defendant's blood unless one
or more of the following considerations cause the court to find
a dismissal unwarranted:
(1) There is evidence that the chemical analysis is unreliable
as evidence of the defendant's intoxication at the time of the
alleged violation due to the lapse of time between the alleged
violation and the obtaining of the specimen;
(2) There is evidence that the defendant was under the influence
of a controlled substance, or drug, or a combination of either
or both with or without alcohol; [or]
(3) There is substantial evidence of intoxication from physical
observations of witnesses or admissions of the defendant[.];
(4) The defendant was charged with a violation of driving with
a positive blood alcohol content and the chemical analysis showed
a measurable and detectable amount of alcohol in such person's
blood, as defined in section 577.012.
577.039. An arrest without a warrant by a law enforcement officer,
including a uniformed member of the state highway patrol, for
a violation of section 577.010 or 577.012 is lawful whenever the
arresting officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person
to be arrested has violated the section, whether or not the violation
occurred in the presence of the arresting officer[; provided,
however, that any such arrest without warrant must be made within
one and onehalf hours after such claimed violation occurred].
577.614. 1. In addition to any other provisions of law, upon a
finding of guilty of, or a plea of guilty to, a violation of subsection
1 of section 577.600, the department of revenue shall revoke the
person's driving privilege for one year from the date of conviction.
2. In addition to any other provision of law, if a person is found
guilty of, or [pleas] pleads guilty to, a
second violation of subsection 1 of section 577.600 during the
same period of required use of an approved ignition interlock
device, the department of revenue shall revoke the person's driving
privilege for five years from the date of conviction.
3. The court shall notify the department of revenue of all guilty
findings and pleas [under] pursuant to subsection
1 of section 577.600.
4. The department of revenue shall charge a reinstatement fee
as required by section 302.304, RSMo, prior to the reinstatement
of any driving privilege suspended or revoked [under]
pursuant to this section.
5. No restricted or limited driving privilege shall be issued
for any person whose license is revoked [under]
pursuant to this section.
6. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any
person who is less than twenty-one years of age who has been found
guilty of or has pled guilty to any state, county or municipal
alcohol-related traffic offense, and/or whose driving privileges
have been suspended or revoked pursuant to an administrative order
and the offense, or incident giving rise to an administrative
order, involved driving with a positive blood alcohol content,
pursuant to section 577.012 or driving with a measurable and detectable
amount of alcohol in the person's blood, as defined in section
302.500, RSMo, shall have all official records and all recordations
of such person's arrest, plea, trial and conviction expunged after
a period of two years; however, such expungement shall be performed
without need of a court order by any person having custody of
such records and any such records shall not be expunged if the
person was found guilty of or pled guilty to operating a commercial
motor vehicle, as defined in section 302.700, RSMo, with a blood
alcohol content of at least four-hundredths of one percent.