HB 349 -- ELDER ABUSE CO-SPONSORS: Hosmer, Ladd Baker, Britt, Selby, Kennedy, Boucher, Kelly (27), McKenna, Crawford, Johnson (61), Williams, Relford, Campbell, Reynolds COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Criminal Law by a vote of 11 to 0. This bill modifies the law relating to protection of the elderly. In its major provisions, the bill: (1) Creates a new chapter on protection of the elderly and transfers several existing statutory sections to this chapter; (2) Requires reports of suspected elder abuse to be referred to the appropriate law enforcement agency. Current law requires only substantiated reports to be referred. The Division of Aging is also required to investigate immediately any report of elder abuse or neglect that involves a threat of imminent harm; (3) Requires the division and law enforcement agencies to cross-train personnel in investigating cases of suspected elder abuse; (4) Makes it a class A misdemeanor for a health care provider to knowingly hire an applicant whose name appears on the Division of Family Services' central registry for child abuse and neglect; who has had a foster care license refused, suspended, or revoked; or who has been disqualified from employment by the Department of Mental Health. This provision has an emergency clause; (5) Allows the Attorney General to handle Medicare fraud investigations. The bill also allows the Attorney General to obtain investigative subpoenas and search warrants in connection with investigations of abuse cases; (6) Authorizes the Division of Aging, when confronted with violations or deficiencies related to staffing, to implement corrective actions such as staffing ratios, training plans, or plans related to staff supervision; (7) Requires facilities to meet or exceed federal requirements concerning the posting of deficiencies; (8) Makes it a class A misdemeanor for a division employee to knowingly disclose the time of an unannounced inspection of a facility licensed by the division and requires the division to terminate his or her employment; (9) Raises the public assistance and Medicaid eligibility asset limit from $2,000 to $7,000 for a couple. The bill also allows the elderly and persons qualifying for total disability benefits with incomes up to 100% of the federal poverty level to qualify for Medicaid; (10) Requires the Division of Medical Services to remit Medicaid payments to long-term care facilities for newly admitted residents within 45 days of admission; and (11) Requires the Division of Aging to restructure the adult day care program by examining the program's requirements, offering additional reimbursement for transportation to such services, and streamlining regulations governing long-term care facilities that offer adult day care services. The bill has an emergency clause for the section requiring background checks for certain healthcare workers. FISCAL NOTE: Estimated Cost to General Revenue Fund of $20,704,587 to $21,579,509 in FY 2002, $33,740,592 to $34,818,392 in FY 2003, and $36,408,161 to $37,499,363 in FY 2004. Cost does not include unknown costs for expansion of the Shared Care Tax Credit. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill, which was developed out of an interim committee's recommendations, is necessary for several reasons, including the state's need to: (1) increase the speed of investigations of elder abuse; (2) coordinate the employee disqualification lists for persons working with children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities; (3) increase cooperation between the Division of Aging and law enforcement officials when necessary; and (4) increase Missouri's individual and family asset limits for certain public assistance moneys from $1,000 and $2,000, which are the lowest in the nation, to $5,000 and $7,000 in order to reach elderly persons who may need assistance for home residence fees or other care. Testifying for the bill were Representatives Hosmer and Ladd Baker; Silver-haired Legislature; Community Leaders Assisting the Insured of Missouri; AARP Jefferson City Chapter 4401; State Auditor's Office; Missouri Health Care Association; Missouri Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers; Missouri Jewish Federations; Attorney General's Office; Missouri Alzheimer's Association; Paraquad Inc.; Governor's Council on Disability; St. Louis Chapter of American Red Cross; Independent Living Centers; Missouri Consumer Health Care WATCH Coalition; and Missouri Aging Federation. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Greg Linhares, Legislative AnalystCopyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives