HCS HB 533 & 724 -- SEXUAL OFFENSES SPONSOR: Hosmer (Johnson, 90) COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Criminal Law by a vote of 11 to 0. This substitute contains several provisions relating to sexual offenses against persons in the care or custody of other persons. The substitute makes it a class B misdemeanor for an owner or employee of a long-term care facility or of an in-home services provider agency, to have sexual contact with a resident of the facility or with a client in his or her care. Second or subsequent violations are class A misdemeanors. In addition, sexual intercourse or deviant sexual intercourse in these cases is a class D felony, and second or subsequent violations are class C felonies. An employee who is married to a resident or client and engages in this activity with his or her spouse is exempt from prosecution. The substitute also creates the crime of sexual contact with a prison inmate. Any employee or other person working in any correctional facility who engages in sexual intercourse or deviate sexual intercourse with any inmate or other resident of the facility is guilty of this crime, a class D felony. Consent of the victim is no defense to prosecution of any of the crimes created in the substitute. FISCAL NOTE: Estimated Net Cost to General Revenue Fund of Unknown less than $100,000 in FY 2002, FY 2003, and FY 2004. PROPONENTS: Supporters of HB 533 state that the bill is necessary to cover those cases of elderly sexual abuse where the victim is not incapacitated and where consent is brought as a possible defense by the alleged perpetrator, so that allegations of these types of crimes, which are often ignored or not prosecuted due to the consent issue, are more fully recognized and prosecuted. Supporters of HB 724 state that the bill is necessary to ensure that the policy of the Department of Corrections regarding sexual offenses against inmates by employees is reinforced throughout the state via the creation of a felony offense. Given the subservient condition of inmates, sexual relationships between inmates and guards could never be considered consensual and should always be prosecuted. Those testifying indicate that these incidents do happen, and that these incidents would be curbed by this legislation. Testifying for HB 533 were Representative Johnson (90); Patricia Hyde; and Jefferson County Prosecutor's Office. Testifying for HB 724 were Representative Britt; Missouri Highway Patrol; and Correctional Medical Services. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Greg Linhares, Legislative AnalystCopyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives