HB 693 -- ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING COMMISSION CO-SPONSORS: Smith, Carnahan COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass by consent" by the Committee on Civil and Administrative Law by a vote of 13 to 0. This bill makes several changes in the law regarding administrative agency proceedings. The bill: (1) Clarifies that persons in the business of buying or selling motor vehicles in the state are subject to the jurisdiction of administrative agencies; (2) Repeals the provisions allowing the Administrative Hearing Commission 10 days to set a hearing date, upon receipt of an application, and 60 days to issue a final decision; (3) Includes motorcycles and all-terrain vehicles within the category of motor vehicles, for purposes of the Administrative Hearing Commission's authority to regulate, and allows the commission to establish a filing fee for the cases; (4) Requires a notice of the right to appeal to be issued with any ruling of the commission on any decision involving the Department of Social Services' denial of public medical assistance; (5) Allows any party before the commission to request that a hearing be held by video conferencing; (6) Repeals several sections granting the commission authority to issue summary judgments on agency rules; and (7) Requires the commission to promulgate uniform rules for its proceedings. Current law allows 3 different sets of rules of procedure, depending on the agencies involved. FISCAL NOTE: No impact on state funds. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the Administrative Hearing Commission occasionally needs more than 60 days to issue its rulings. The bill will make hearings before the commission easier for many parties, who may conduct the hearing by video-conferencing if they wish, rather than traveling to Jefferson City. Also, the commission has jurisdiction over disputes between automobile distributors and retailers and needs authority to charge a filing fee for these cases. Testifying for the bill were Representative Smith; and Sharon Busch, Administrative Hearing Commissioner. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Richard Smreker, Senior Legislative AnalystCopyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives