HCS HB 924, 714, 685, 756, 734, & 518 -- TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSPORTATION FUNDING SPONSOR: Koller (Wiggins) COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Transportation by a vote of 15 to 5. This substitute is a comprehensive package relating to transportation and transportation funding. The substitute: (1) Repeals the 6-cent motor fuel tax enacted in 1992 and enacts a 9-cent motor fuel tax; (2) Increases the state sales and use tax on tangible personal property, including the purchase and lease of motor vehicles, trailers, boats, and outboard motors, from 4% to 4.75%; (3) Removes the sunset and the cap on the sales and use tax upon aviation jet fuel; (4) Ends the payment of revenue from the Transportation Department Fund for non-department use; (5) Redirects the current one-half of the proceeds from the tax on motor vehicles, trailers, boats, and outboard motors from the General Revenue Fund to newly created funds, the Public Transit Fund and the Multimodal Fund. Eighty percent of the redirected revenue will go to the Public Transit Fund to be used for planning, locating, relocating, establishing, acquiring, constructing, administering, developing, maintaining, or operating public transit systems in the state. Twenty percent will go to the Multimodal Fund to be used for non-highway transportation projects and public transit projects; (6) Creates a State-Local Cooperation Fund and an Interstate Improvement Fund into which one-third of the increase in sales and use tax will be deposited. (Two-thirds will go to the General Revenue Fund.) Of the one-third increase, one-fourth will go to the State-Local Cooperation Fund to be used to award grants for locally identified transportation projects and three-fourths will go to the Interstate Improvement Fund to be used for principal and interest payment on bonds, maintenance, preservation, improvement, construction, and reconstruction of the state's interstate highway system; (7) Requires the state to maintain up to 40 center-line miles of arterial state highways in the City of St. Louis. The city will be responsible for all right-of-way and utilities located under the traveled portion on these arterial highways within the city; (8) Eliminates the requirement that road projects be bid in sections not to exceed 10 miles; (9) Allows the Highways and Transportation Commission to enter into design-build highway project contracts. Design-build projects may be used only for construction work greater than 10 miles; (10) Increases vehicle registration fees by 33%; and (11) Lowers the blood alcohol content (BAC) level necessary for a conviction of driving with excessive BAC from .10 to .08. Additional revenue produced by the substitute will not be considered part of total state revenue within the meaning of Sections 17 and 18 of Article X of the Constitution. The substitute contains 2 referendum clauses. The parts of the substitute which increase, direct, or redirect revenues are subject to a vote of the people at a special election on November 5, 2002. The additional revenue raised by the substitute will be subject to referendum in 2012 and every 10 years thereafter. FISCAL NOTE: Total Estimated Net Effect on All State Funds of a cost of $9,206,630 in FY 2002, an income of $249,585,399 in FY 2003, and an income of $659,383,860 in FY 2004. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that adequate transportation funding is of major importance to Missouri's economy and now is the time to fix that need. Testifying for the bill were Representatives Wiggins, Koller, Bray, Seigfreid, Ostmann, and Hartzler; Transport Missouri; Bi-State Development Agency (HB's 924, 685); East-West Gateway Council (HB 924); St. Louis Regional Chamber and Growth Association (HB's 924, 685, 734); Trailnet (HB 685); Missouri Bicycle Federation (HB 685); City of Columbia (HB 685); Citizens for Modern Transit (HB's 924, 734); Missouri Public Transit Association (HB's 692, 685); Sierra Club (HB 685); Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (HB's 756, 685, 924, 734); Missouri Department of Transportation (HB 714); Missouri Transportation Coalition (HB 924); Associated General Contractor's of St. Louis (HB 714); Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce (HB's 924, 756, 734); Jacobs/Sverdrup Facilities, Inc. (HB 714); and City of Columbia-terminal Railroad (HB 685). OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Robert Triplett, Legislative AnalystCopyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives