HB 1208 -- REGISTERED NURSE FIRST ASSISTANTS SPONSOR: Barry COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Children, Families and Health by a vote of 11 to 3. Effective January 1, 2003, this bill requires health insurance plans to provide coverage for services provided by registered nurse first assistants consistently practicing as independent contractors within their scope of practice. The bill also defines "registered nurse first assistant" and requires the State Board of Nursing to specify which professional nursing organization certifications will be recognized for registered nurse first assistants and to establish criteria for other registered nurses to use the title other than through such certification. FISCAL NOTE: Estimated Net Cost to General Revenue Fund of $0 in FY 2003, Unknown in FY 2004, and Unknown in FY 2005. Expected to exceed $100,000 annually. Estimated Net Income to Nursing Fund of $0 in FY 2003, $15,000 in FY 2004, and $0 in FY 2005. Estimated Net Income to Insurance Dedicated Fund of $9,850 in FY 2003, $0 in FY 2004, and $0 in FY 2005. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that registered nurse first assistants are licensed registered nurses with advanced training who provide cost-effective and quality care to patients. The bill ensures that registered nurse first assistants receive reimbursement from insurance companies for services provided during surgeries. Testifying for the bill were Representative Barry; Missouri Nurses Association; Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers Union Local 5-6 of St. Louis; Missouri AFL-CIO; Missouri Association of Registered Nurse First Assistants; and Association of Operating Room Nurses. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that insurance companies will experience increased costs resulting from the submission of insurance claims by registered nurse first assistants for services performed. Registered nurse first assistants are not available in rural areas of the state. The bill could result in a loss of jobs held by surgical technicians. Testifying against the bill were Beverly Oster; Association of Surgical Technologists; and Missouri Association of Osteopathic Physicians and Surgeons. Joseph Deering, Legislative AnalystCopyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives