HCS HB 1780 -- CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SPONSOR: Smith (Green, 73) COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Civil and Administrative Law by a vote of 8 to 6. This substitute makes several changes to the law governing how health insurance premiums are collected by employers as part of court-ordered child support. The substitute: (1) Requires the Division of Child Support Enforcement to use federal guidelines in notifying employers of their obligation to enroll the obligor's child in their health benefits plan. The division must notify the employer within two days of the employee's name appearing on the state's directory of new hires; (2) Requires an obligor who wants to contest the withholding of funds for required employee contributions to do so in writing within 30 days; (3) Requires the employer to notify its health plan within 20 days of the order for health benefits coverage, and the health plan must respond within 40 days of the order; (4) Requires the health plan to provide the custodial parent and the division with a description of coverages that are available; (5) Requires the division and custodial parent to select a plan option within 20 days, or the child will be enrolled in the health plan's default option; (6) Requires employers to promptly notify the division when the obligor leaves its employ and provide it with the last known address for the obligor and the obligor's new employer, if known; and (7) Removes the obligation to provide health benefits for the child if the obligor's employer eliminates family health coverage for all of its employees. The substitute has an emergency clause. FISCAL NOTE: Estimated Net Cost to General Revenue Fund of $68,801 in FY 2003, $29,908 in FY 2004, and $35,974 in FY 2005. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that federal law enacted in 1998 requires that a specific form be given to employers, so that they can withhold from payroll checks an amount to cover the premiums for children's health benefits that are part of a child support order. The federal government covers 66% of the costs of child support enforcement. Some of that money could be withheld if the state does not comply with federal requirements. Testifying for the bill were Representative Green (73); and Division of Child Support Enforcement. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Richard Smreker, Senior Legislative AnalystCopyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives