HB1685 - SHAMPOO ASSISTANTS - Smith, Philip
HB1685 Clarifies that shampoo assistants are not required to have cosmetology licenses.
Sponsor: Smith, Philip (11) Effective Date:00/00/0000
CoSponsor: LR Number: 3687L.01P
Last Action: 04/17/2000 - SEE COMMENTS
PURSUANT TO RULE 47 BILL HAS BEEN DROPPED FROM
CALENDAR
HB1685
Next Hearing:Hearing not scheduled
Calendar:Bill currently not on calendar
ACTIONS HEARINGS CALENDAR
BILL SUMMARIES BILL TEXT FISCAL NOTES
BILL SEARCH HOUSE HOME PAGE

Available Bill Summaries for HB1685 Copyright(c)
* Perfected * Committee * Introduced

Available Bill Text for HB1685
* Introduced *

BILL SUMMARIES

PERFECTED

HB 1685 -- SHAMPOO ASSISTANTS (Smith)

This bill defines "shampoo assistant" and states that a
cosmetology license is not required to work as a shampoo
assistant.

FISCAL NOTE:  No impact on state funds.


COMMITTEE

HB 1685 -- SHAMPOO ASSISTANTS

SPONSOR:  Smith

COMMITTEE ACTION:  Voted "do pass by consent" by the Committee
on Professional Registration and Licensing by a vote of 14 to 0.

This bill defines "shampoo assistant" and states that a
cosmetology license is not required to work as a shampoo
assistant.

FISCAL NOTE:  No impact on state funds.

PROPONENTS:  Supporters say that this bill is needed because a
shampoo assistant must go to school for about a year and most
people are unwilling to do the training to be a shampoo
assistant.  This bill would allow shampoo assistants to obtain
on-the-job training and would also help small shops obtain help.

Testifying for the bill were Representative Smith; and Charlotte
Hagemeir.

OPPONENTS:  There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

Bob Dominique, Legislative Analyst


INTRODUCED

HB 1685 -- Shampoo Assistants

Sponsor:  Smith

This bill defines "shampoo assistant" and states that a
cosmetology license is not required to work as a shampoo
assistant.


redbar

Missouri House of Representatives' Home Page
Last Updated October 5, 2000 at 11:34 am